58 Comments
User's avatar
Debra L.'s avatar

Notice Carney said we will build a strong Quebec, a strong Canada!!! What would have happened if he said we would build a strong Alberta, or a strong Saskatchewan? Silence....???!!!

Trevor Marr's avatar

We are not in his plan. Let’s ‘GO’ #ALBERTA!

Crusader 5's avatar

To be fair no Canadian is in his plan only he & Brookfield matter.

Doug's avatar

Why is protecting culture and quebecs wants more than the rest of Canada. Carney is vague on his reaso. But it sounds day like it’s all Quebec and labelling. How dumb is carney to punish the rest of Canada to protect the dairy cartels of Canada.

Tony McLean's avatar

It's China. Carney's on the take. 🇨🇳

Trudy Paul's avatar

Lots of Liberal votes there.

Trevor Marr's avatar

Carney’s intentional incompetence is treasonous?

Irene Mosher's avatar

Why would Carney say that "We'll build a strong Canada and Quebec......."? Isn't Quebec already in Canada?

Don's avatar

..ya..but THEY are a "distinct society"..(not to be lumped together with us "old-stock Canadians"who seem to have everyone on the planet wanting us wiped out..) NICE..SCHMICE..let's get at it..!!🎯 ⚔

Andree's avatar

Historically, "old stock Quebecers" are older stock than "old stock Canadians" since you make a distinction. My ancestors arrived in the 1640s and 1650s. Also historically, Nova Scotia wanted to separate and leave Confederation early on, so did BC who wanted to join the US. Québec had the choice to join the US and become the 14th state during the Secession War but the religious authorities who controlled the society chose to stay with the British and swore allegiance to the king of England. Quebecers are not the original separatists and I think that many of our First Nations consider themselves "distinct societies" whether we accept it or not. But I also wondered why Carney said what he did. Another "divide to conquer" moment.

Debra Seymour's avatar

He is kissing Quebec’s you know what, because he needs Quebec’s votes. I am afraid he is politicking for his next election!! Hope Quebec people can see through this!!

Don's avatar

🎯..yup..that prick's got us fighting everyone...but HIM..🤔

Karen R Harris's avatar

Quebec should not be any more "entitled" than the rest of Canada !

Don's avatar

amen!!..but..a few months back I received a link regarding Pierre Trudeau/ Quebec Elitists..and our 1982 Constitution. Apparently, Pierre never had it legally ratified..something only he..and some of the Quebec elite, were aware of .according to the author..without ratification..we have no constitution..nor official status..as a country...I'll try to find where I stored that link, and send to you if interested..or even google Pierre Trudeau.. ..1982 constitution ratified (something like that) and see what comes up...sounds far-fetched..but as I kept reading that link, which is quite detailed..it started to actually make sense..

Joyce V. Smith's avatar

It was ratified and proclaimed into law by QEII on April 17, 1982 in a ceremony on Parliament Hill.

Don's avatar
Aug 31Edited

Ya..so we were told....but if our constitution WAS ratified..Justin and Carney would NOT have been able to exploit it..and US .the way they have...trust me..we havn't had a legal constitution since 1982..we were scammed..and the Elites in Ottawa/ Quebec and Buckingham Palace KNOW it..(one of the main reasons Quebec gets anything they want)..Really don't blame you for doubting me..but the speed Canada (and the rest of "The Free World) is being overtaken, the truth will come out very shortly....hope everyone has their beans/ bullets and bandaids stocked up..(and whatever's coming..it will be ALOT longer than 72 hrs)

Andree's avatar

Apparently, according to some, legally we are still under the 1931 Statutes of Westminster. Which would also means that each province is sovereign. No need for big separatist campaigns.

Joyce V. Smith's avatar

Also, although Quebec didn't sign, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in Patriation Reference that while the constitutional conventions required significant provincial consent, there was no requirement for unanimous provincial approval for the federal govt to proceed.

Tony McLean's avatar

Sovereignty Association effectively.

Tech Buzzard's avatar

We are being played here. We have yet to see the details of the negotiation. The federal bye elections are on August 31. How convenient to extend the deadline to September. The liberals are once again using anti-American rhetoric and propaganda to boost their support and consolidate their power. There will be a deal done in September. If the government took a hardline on China with security and trade we would get a sweet deal from the U.S. National security is the number 1 priority in the U.S.

Tony McLean's avatar

Should be here too. Fire Comrade Carney!

Deborah Thompson's avatar

Absolutely! They are sneaks of the highest order - anything to get what THEY want, never mind the needs of Canadians! 🤨

Mc Ursula's avatar

The only reason Carney isn't retaliating until September 8 is because of the bi-elections. The same reason for tanking the trade deal. He needs all those elbozos vote, before he takes an even worse deal.

Tony McLean's avatar

How do you know what's in it?

Don's avatar

It's not for us to know..(as far as Carney's concerned)..

Karen R Harris's avatar

I wondered if Carney thinks he'll lose the by-elections, if we all knew . . . - I still don't believe one word that he says, anytime !

Norton's avatar

Smith is just being politically correct giving Carney some praise. The smart cookie she is, its certain she thinks of Carney as a blabbering idiot.

Tony McLean's avatar

Carney was the one who walked out, not the US!

Logic's avatar

WEF New World Order Conflict Carney can't lose, dining high-on-the-hog in Canada, and jetsetting in luxury around the world to make future Brookfield business contacts, all as his US business empire grows and expands. Chase his insatiable lust for personal wealth and power, then parachute back to his US home, wife and family. Suckers!

Trevor Marr's avatar

If we had a capable and truthful mainstream media, all corrupt things Carney would be exposed already, and his fan base would implode!

Barney's avatar

Here is a major potential problem that Carney is leading us into. He has used the term war, and that is a major mistake. The Yank papers have picked that up and if Trump or any of the other idiots there decide to turn this into a Canada/US war I believe we are toast. The reason is that

virtually every American I have ever met considers himself/herself a patriot and looks for ways to prove it. I doubt Carney and his clowns have considered what that could mean for us. Approx 40% of the revenue of our Major banks comes from the US in the way of financial advisors and investing, in addition hundreds of billions of $ pf Canadian business is done in the US and should Trump or any other nitwit decide to identify their bank as Canadian and the company

they have been dealing with as Canadian you can bet many will pull their business and move it elsewhere just as Canadians are doing. We cannot afford to lose that business.

Don's avatar

..as is Carney's goal..

Dennis Cross's avatar

Publish the proposed Agreement so we Canadians can decide for ourselves if Carney is working in our best interests. Sounds like he is working for himself and Queerbec.

Trevor Marr's avatar

And he works for Brookfield, the UN, and the WEF! But certainly not Canada?

Don's avatar

"Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is warning Ottawa that retaliatory tariffs meant to punish the U.S. could instead hammer Canadian wallets"

Well, yeah..that's been the plan all along..he strung Trump along..again..and look at the MSM just spreading the good word about Carney "standing up" to Trump..(while he's in Italy..)...

..Carney may have a REALLY short flight back here,tho.

Victorine Warner's avatar

carny's behavior is typical of an egotistical greedy bully-boy. This will hurt Canadians. It'll barely if at all hurt any Americans and it sure won't hurt carny will it? Just us long suffering Canadians. I sure hope those liberal supporters feel it good. That's all those useful idiots deserve

Gary's avatar

I agree that he PM should not have signed any agreement, but the why is the big question in my mind. I am very sceptical of his explanation, lots of words but very little substance. I am getting the feeling these by elections are taking a larger priority in his decision. His past performance in this regard points that way. But now we have wait and see and Canadians are going to take the hit on this either way, NOT HIM.

Andree's avatar

Did we get anything else than theater from Carney???

Marilyn Hagerman's avatar

There were just a couple of key demands from the United States that made it really untenable for us to sign off,” she said. “It would have been too painful.”

Soooo, why the big secret? What are these oh so painful demands? Smith, of all the wishy-washy premiers, would have been the wise and smart one to knock markist Carney on his Beijing loving backside! Seems she’s under the Trump-blaming-spell of Carney! What a disappointment Alberta’s Premier is becoming, or has become!!

Don's avatar

When did Carney start giving a shit about OUR suffering??..and as far as learning what really happened at that meeting..Carney will take that to the grave..(stay tuned)

Trevor Marr's avatar

In #DanielleSmith I trust. With regards to #Carney, she is holding Alberta’s friends close and Alberta’s enemies closer?

Dan Anders's avatar

Why? Why is Danielle Smith so accommodating (not to mention Pierre Poilievre) to the worst and most corrupt government in Canadian history? It’s really starting to tick me off. Neither seems to remember that they have a spine but instead lend theirs to the Crony Cabal who are destroying Canada.

#ABindependence 100%