18 Comments
User's avatar
Anthony Tasker's avatar

Yes ,,, i agree ... Mind your own business and fix what the government is doing with the AHS , Why did they go after Dr Makis ... treasonous bastards

Gail Mac's avatar

That was College of Physicians & Surgeons that went after Dr Makis. Get your facts straight. TmCPS need to be reeled in

Eva Smillie's avatar

The very same College of P & S that went after the licenses of ethical doctors during the plan-demic. Not too many clear consciences at 80 College St.

Crusader 5's avatar

I guess you missed all of danielle smith's office mignons involvement. But hey, she's the only honest politician, right? πŸ˜†

Gail Mac's avatar

Guess you missed CPS involvement.

Crusader 5's avatar

No, but it falls squarely on her desk and what she was told to do: kill cheap cancer cures, a cured patient is a lost customer.

Reid Moseley's avatar

Why can't these self-righteous government types just mind their own business. Anything to screw the general publiuc out of their freedom. And they do tyhis with their hands in their suspenders mode.

These women should go home and take care of their delinquent children.

Go spend yoyr energy at the Parent - Teacher's meetings.

Wayne Kachur's avatar

Vaping is as toxic to health as cigarettes are.

Louise's avatar

Where is the proof of this? So far the top surgeon general of TO hospital says 95% harm reduction with vaping vs smoking.

Eva Smillie's avatar

Do you remember Dr. Theresa Tam, the former Chief Pubic Health Officer of Canada? Why did she become such a pusher of the jab$ during the plan-demic? She's a proponent of not allowing Ivermectin, which would've saved millions of lives, prevented vaccine injuries by the millions .. was it the million$? How these folks sleep at night amazes me. Oh yes, they're Big Pharma fans.

Gail Mac's avatar

Actually, vaping doesn't have the toxic chemicals cigarettes do. Why does Health Canada allow all the toxic chemicals?

Eva Smillie's avatar

Same reason they allowed the toxic jab$

Barbara Gauthier's avatar

Personally I think this bill is just a redirect from other concerning things. However I totally disagree that vaping id 95%safer than smoking! Both tobacco and vape products are fill ed with chemicals! Instead of banning stuff how about you go after the tobacco companies and those making vaping products and force both to REMOVE THE CHEMICAL AGENTS FOUND IN THESE PRODUCTS! Tobacco is not the issue but all the chemical additives are! I would hazard a guess the same goes for vaping products. Probably full of unnecessary dangerous chemicals!

Gail Mac's avatar

Cigarettes have 7,000 toxic chemicals, vaping does not. I think it's a mistake banning flavors and leaving tobacco available, making youth going for Cigarettes instead. Just a previous smokers experience.

Dianne's avatar

This article says smoking and vaping are down and vaping is 95% less harmful, so MLA mind your own business. Maybe you should check how much alcohol and drugs that youth are taking.

Louise's avatar

I get why they think this is a good move; keep it away from attracting kids.

BUT this way is silly, even though it's how I like my nic solution. Flavorless.

Easy to get flavors - add in your own flavors.

wanderer's avatar

Hmmm! She is not very bright, so wonder why she is doing this?? Could it be cigarette lobbyists needing a patsy to take out the vape competition?? It's always about money!!