The US government’s narrative about the so-called “Capitol Siege” is beginning to crumble.
Over the past few months, federal authorities have been cracking down on conspirators involved in the January 6 incident, however, suspiciously a number of key suspects have not been prosecuted.
The facts laid out in an earth-shattering report by Revolver.news has left many convinced that the FBI had a controlling interest in the illegal activity on that cold Wednesday morning.
This could be one of the largest deep state scandals of the century.
The report asks the chilling question: Did undercover federal or intelligence agents lead and plan the plot to attack the Capitol?
One of the suspects only identified as “Person Two” by the Department of Justice was a leading conspirator in a supposed plot by several individuals including 65-year-old Thomas Caldwell. Caldwell, who was believed to be involved in militia groups, could face up to 20 years in prison over charges of conspiracy and obstructing official proceedings.
Despite the serious charges faced by Caldwell and others, the anonymous Person Two identified in the indictment has remained miraculously unindicted himself.
“Meanwhile, CALDWELL, who was positioned on the west side of the Capitol, joined with PERSON TWO and others known and unknown in storming past barricades and climbing stairs up to a balcony on the West side of the Capitol building,” the DOJ indictment states.
Similarly a third co-conspirator identified only as Person Three has also avoided charges thus far. But it doesn’t end there, nearly a dozen anonymous conspirators who played leading roles in groups like the Oath Keepers have avoided any charges resulting from the January 6 events.
When pressed on whether federal agents were involved in the groups supposedly responsible for the Capitol siege, FBI Director Christopher Wray avoided the question entirely.
What is it about the Capitol attack that the US government is covering up? How many informants or federal agents were involved? What roles did they play in the so-called “siege”?
